A controversial bill in the Montana Senate, SB 474, has sparked heated debate as it would allow exceptions to vaccine requirements for religious and medical reasons. The bill, introduced by Sen. Daniel Emrich, aims to give parents more control over their children’s vaccinations. However, opponents, such as Sen. Cora Neumann, argue that the bill could compromise herd immunity and create a dangerously permissive exemption policy.
During the Senate floor debate, an amendment was proposed by Sen. Susan Webber to exclude Tribal Nations from the bill, citing tribal laws that require vaccinations for all students. Sen. Barry Usher opposed the amendment, arguing that if Tribal Nations receive funding from the state, they should adhere to state laws. The amendment ultimately failed with a vote of 28-22.
The bill narrowly advanced with a vote of 29-21 and is now slated for a final vote in the Senate before a crucial mid-session deadline for general policy bills. Despite the ongoing debate and divide among lawmakers, the fate of SB 474 hangs in the balance as it moves closer to becoming law.
Clayton Murphy, a reporter with the UM Legislative News Service, covered the Senate debate and can be contacted for further information. The outcome of this bill could have far-reaching implications for vaccination policies in Montana and beyond.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
